HEARING SOUND AND SEEING IMAGES ON EARTH FROM SPACE!
Understanding satellites work with cell towers, especially using GPS.
New methods of multiple satellites are now I believe possible to provide GPS (See GPS pages)
All controlled via USA AIR FORCE MAIN BASE > (See GPS pages)
SPACE IS A VACUUM - RESTRICTING TRADITIONAL SOUND VIBRATIONS
SCALAR WAVES IS I BELIEVE QUANTUM FORCE CARRIER OF SOUND - PIGGY BACKING - ATTACHING SOUND - ULTRA SOUND
Always do your own research to confirm all details - mistakes can be made or else where like ChatGPT misleading deception is par for the course
HEARING SOUND VOICES ON EARTH FROM SPACE!
SEEING IMAGES ON EARTH FROM SPACE!
Tiffany Fontenot - Shared with Public·
E-Systems could clearly see the picture on a dime lying in the street from space in the 80's. It's ridiculous for the public to believe that Fred doesn't know what happened in Butler or to Chalie Kirk or J6.
CHAT GPT...
You said:
can you give a history of detailed images of earth like reading newspaer from space
ChatGPT said:
Seeing detailed images of Earth from space—clear enough to, say, read a newspaper—has been a long-standing goal in satellite imaging, but it's also surrounded by some misconceptions. Let's break it down into a timeline of technological development, actual resolution capabilities, and some examples of detailed imagery from space.
🔭 1. Early Satellite Imagery (1960s–1980s)
Corona Program (1960–1972)
First U.S. spy satellite program.
Used film that was physically dropped back to Earth.
Resolution: ~2 meters per pixel (best case).
Could see buildings and ships, but not fine details like text.
Landsat Program (Started 1972)
Civilian use for mapping, agriculture, and environmental studies.
Resolution: Early Landsat had ~60–80 meters/pixel.
Not suitable for identifying cars, people, or signs.
🛰️ 2. Commercial & Military Advancements (1990s–2000s)
KH-11 (First launched in 1976, upgraded into 2000s)
U.S. military optical reconnaissance satellite, classified.
Believed to have Hubble-like optics (2.4m mirror).
Estimated resolution: 10–15 cm/pixel or better.
Could possibly detect objects the size of a newspaper, but not read the text.
Ikonos (1999) – First high-res commercial satellite.
Resolution: 1 meter (black-and-white), 4 meters (color).
Cities, roads, vehicles were visible; text was not.
QuickBird (2001–2015)
Resolution: 61 cm (panchromatic).
One of the first commercial satellites to clearly see individual cars.
🛰️ 3. Modern High-Resolution Satellites (2010s–Present)
GeoEye-1 (2008)
Resolution: 41 cm (black and white).
Used by Google Earth.
Could distinguish vehicles, people, but not read license plates or text.
WorldView-3 (2014, Maxar Technologies)
Resolution: 31 cm (black and white); 1.24 m (color).
One of the highest-resolution commercial satellites available.
Still not enough to read fine print or text on a newspaper.
Reading a newspaper from space?
That would require resolution of ~0.1 mm per pixel — orders of magnitude beyond current or even classified satellite capabilities.
🔍 Why Can’t We Read a Newspaper from Space?
Optics Limitation: A satellite hundreds of kilometers above Earth needs a huge telescope and perfect conditions.
Atmospheric distortion: Earth’s atmosphere introduces blur (just like stars twinkle).
Diffraction limit: There are physical limits to resolving power based on mirror size and wavelength.
Motion blur: Satellites move ~7 km/sec, making super-fine detail even harder to capture.
To read newspaper print (~1 mm letters) from 400 km orbit, you'd need:
A telescope with a mirror over 100 meters wide, or
To be flying much closer, like a drone or low-flying aircraft.
🖼️ Coolest Real Examples of "Extreme Detail"
WorldView-3 Image of Burj Khalifa
You can see the building, shadow, cars, and some sidewalk detail.
But you can’t read signs or text.
KH-11 Spy Satellite Leak (1984)
A leaked photo of a Soviet airfield had ~10 cm resolution.
Incredible detail, but still far from "reading text".
Private Aircraft Imagery
Drones and planes flying at <1 km altitude can easily read road signs, billboards, or newspaper text.
Used in urban surveillance and mapping, but not from orbit.
🧠 Summary Table
System Year Type Est. Resolution Can Read Newspaper?
Corona (KH-1–KH-4) 1960s Military ~2m ❌
KH-11 1976+ Military ~10–15 cm ❌
Ikonos 1999 Commercial 1m ❌
GeoEye-1 2008 Commercial 41 cm ❌
WorldView-3 2014 Commercial 31 cm ❌
Drone Imagery Now Aerial <1 cm ✅
✅ Final Takeaway:
No satellite can read a newspaper from space.
Even the best current or known classified systems are good for identifying people, cars, and buildings, but cannot resolve printed text.
If you're interested in the physics or want to simulate what a satellite could theoretically see, I can show you how to calculate ground sample distance (GSD) based on altitude and optics.
Would you like that?
You said:
Yes and is it possible seeing or reading a dime form space? Thank you
ChatGPT said:
You're welcome—and great follow-up question!
Let’s now walk through whether it's possible to see or read a dime from space, and the physics behind it, including ground sample distance (GSD) and practical limitations.
🪙 Can You See or Read a Dime from Space?
⚖️ Size of a U.S. Dime:
Diameter: 17.91 mm (about 1.8 cm or ~0.7 inches)
Text on Dime (e.g., “Liberty”): Letter height ≈ 1 mm or smaller
🚀 Understanding Resolution: GSD
Ground Sample Distance (GSD) is the key factor that determines how much detail a satellite can see. It tells you how many meters (or centimeters) each pixel covers on the ground.
🧮 GSD Formula:
GSD=H⋅pf
GSD=fH⋅p
Where:
HH = altitude of the satellite (in meters)
pp = pixel size of the sensor (in meters)
ff = focal length of the camera lens (in meters)
The smaller the GSD, the better the resolution.
To "see" a dime (distinguish it from the background), you'd want GSD ≤ 2 cm
To "read" a dime (resolve the letters), you’d need GSD ≤ 0.1 mm (100 microns) — a crazy high level of detail.
📊 Let's Compare Required Resolution to Known Satellites:
Target Task Needed Resolution Best Known Satellite Resolution (WorldView-4) Achievable?
See a dime (detect) ~1.5–2 cm/pixel ~0.31 m (31 cm/pixel) ❌ No
Read a dime (text) ~0.1 mm/pixel ❌ Unachievable from orbit ❌ No
🛰️ What Would It Take to Read a Dime from Orbit?
Let’s say a satellite is in low Earth orbit (LEO) at ~400 km altitude.
To get 0.1 mm/pixel resolution from that height, the telescope aperture would need to be huge.
🧠 Use Rayleigh's Diffraction Limit:
θ=1.22⋅λD
θ=1.22⋅Dλ
Where:
θθ is the angular resolution in radians
λλ is the wavelength (e.g., visible light ≈ 550 nm)
DD is the diameter of the aperture
Then:
GSD=H⋅θ
GSD=H⋅θ
Solving backward, to achieve 0.1 mm resolution from 400 km, you’d need an aperture of:
D≈1.22⋅550×10−9⋅400,0000.0001≈2.7 meters
D≈0.00011.22⋅550×10−9⋅400,000≈2.7 meters
✅ In theory, a ~3-meter telescope could get you that resolution — ignoring all real-world issues.
BUT:
Atmospheric distortion kills image clarity from orbit.
Motion blur: Satellites move at 7+ km/sec.
Sensor noise, optical limits, and focus problems all reduce effective resolution.
No known satellite, classified or otherwise, operates with this clarity.
✈️ Can You See a Dime from a Plane or Drone?
Yes, absolutely.
A high-res drone camera at 100 meters with a good lens can easily get sub-millimeter GSD, enough to read the letters on a dime.
This is common in industrial inspection, mapping, and surveillance.
🧩 Realistic Visibility:
Platform Resolution Can See Dime? Can Read Dime?
Satellite (WorldView) ~30 cm/pixel ❌ No ❌ No
KH-11 (classified) ~10–15 cm/pixel ❌ No ❌ No
Plane (300 m alt) ~5 cm/pixel ✅ Maybe ❌ Unlikely
Drone (100 m alt) <1 mm/pixel ✅ Yes ✅ Yes
✅ Final Answer:
No, you cannot see or read a dime from space—not even with the most advanced spy satellites.
However, you can easily see and read it from low-altitude aircraft or drones using high-resolution optical sensors.
Let me know if you want an interactive simulation (e.g., what a satellite image of a dime would look like) — or if you're curious how this compares to what’s used in espionage or Google Earth.
You said:
What sounds on earth can be heared from space?
ChatGPT said:
Great question — and it touches on a fascinating mix of physics, space science, and popular myths.
Let’s break it down clearly:
🌌 Can Sounds from Earth Be Heard in Space?
🚫 Short Answer: No, not directly.
Sound needs a medium (like air, water, or solid materials) to travel through.
Space is a vacuum — and in a vacuum, there are no molecules to carry sound waves.
So, if you're floating in orbit, even right above a loud rock concert or explosion, you’d hear nothing through open space.
📡 But Are There Any Exceptions?
Yes — indirectly. Some sounds or vibrations can be detected or transmitted to space, depending on how they move:
✅ 1. Radio Waves & Electromagnetic Signals
While not sound themselves, radio, microwave, and other electromagnetic waves can be transmitted into space.
Examples:
Earth’s radio and TV broadcasts leak into space.
Lightning strikes produce VLF (Very Low Frequency) radio waves that can escape the atmosphere.
These are detected by satellites or probes, but they need to be converted into audio to be heard.
NASA and other scientists have converted these into eerie, “spacey” sounds. They’re not sounds in the air, but they sound like them when played back.
✅ 2. Seismic Vibrations or Mechanical Coupling
If a spacecraft or satellite is connected to Earth (like via a tether or in the upper atmosphere), vibrations can travel through that solid medium.
Example: In the ISS (International Space Station), astronauts can hear sounds from inside the station (fans, pumps), but not from outside.
✅ 3. Sounds Transmitted via Atmosphere — At the Edge of Space
The Kármán line (about 100 km above sea level) is considered the edge of space. But:
Atmospheric pressure decreases rapidly with altitude, making sound fade quickly.
At ~50–60 km, you’re in a region where some low-frequency sounds (called infrasound) can still travel horizontally, but not far vertically.
Project examples:
NASA and others have used high-altitude balloons to record infrasound from volcanoes, rocket launches, and storms.
These might be heard by spacecraft passing through the very upper atmosphere, but not from full orbit.
🔇 Famous Examples of Misconception
Apollo astronauts on the Moon couldn't hear external sounds — only via radio headsets.
Hollywood scenes of explosions in space with loud booms are wrong. Real space is silent.
🎧 So What "Sounds" Have Been Detected from Earth in Space?
Here are some real examples (converted into sound):
Source Detected By Description
Lightning strikes EM satellites VLF radio bursts, "whistlers"
Earth's magnetic field NASA Constant low-frequency “hum” (converted into sound)
Auroras (Northern Lights) Polar orbiting satellites Produce VLF waves that can be converted to eerie sounds
Radio & TV signals SETI projects, radio telescopes Leak into space — faint, but detectable
Rocket launches High-altitude balloons & microphones Infrasound travels vast distances
Explosions (e.g., volcanoes) Infrasound detectors Detected by satellites and ground-based sensors
🧠 Final Summary:
Question Answer
Can human voices, traffic, or city noise be heard in space? ❌ No
Can EM signals (radio, VLF) from Earth be detected in space? ✅ Yes
Can space-based sensors “hear” Earth using special tools? ✅ Yes (indirectly, through conversion)
Is space silent? ✅ To our ears, yes
If you’d like, I can share actual audio clips of Earth’s radio emissions or simulate what Earth might "sound like" from space using converted electromagnetic data.
Would you like to hear that?
Get smarter responses, upload files and images, and more.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info. See Cookie Preferences.
Create Your Own Website With Webador